Sign in  |  Register  |  Help

Most Read on APEsphere

Most Commented on APEsphere

Blogs we like

Resources

 
By Andrew Newton on 16 Mar, 2010 - 16:42 UTC

A little update on what I have been up to and what happens now...

 

You may have noticed that things have been a little quiet on APEsphere these last couple of months. I am now able to explain why.

 

It has long been my view that the global financial crisis is the single biggest responsible business issue of the decade. Yes, even bigger than climate change, because thanks to the global financial crisis efforts to address climate change have been badly set back.

 

While regulatory reform - specifically a reversal of the deregulatory fervor fo the last thirty years - is clearly needed, what strikes me is the way we talk about the crisis in such abstract terms. It is so standard to talk about what the markets did, or even "the banks", and to talk in aggregate terms about unemployment, foreclosure, bankruptcy.

 

Of course, those statistics are always worth repeating:

Not to mention the fact that the crisis is associated with a sharp uptick in mental health problems and suicide rates, children being pulled out of schools and put to work, increases in human trafficking, social unrest and violent conflict.

 

But all this talk of aggregates repeats part of the problem that got us into this mess in the first place. Aggregates create emotional distance. They enable us to forget that the crisis both impacts and was brought about by individuals.

 

So Kelsey Timmerman and I are about to set out on a journey to tell some of the personal stories behind the numbers - our very own Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. Our blog, NOTHING P€R$ONAL, will be the main means by which we keep readers updated on our travels, though I will also post some of those stories here on APEsphere.

 

Kelsey has penned the first post here, explaining why this project is so personal. You can also join the conversation through our twitter stream @0_personal.

 

If coverage of the financial crisis seems to you to be missing something important, we hope this blog will fill the void. Enjoy.

ADVERTISEMENT
Reading: US ramps up probe of banks
By Andrew Newton on 13 May, 2010 - 20:05 UTC
ADVERTISEMENT

The International Monetary Fund is not known for random assaults on the financial establishment.

 

This makes the results of a new IMF study - A Fistfull of Dollars: Lobbying and the Financial Crisis -  all the more compelling. Large US banks that spend heavily on lobbying are more likely to engage in high-risk lending, and their shares perform less well. The UK's Guardian newspaper notes that finance sector lobbying outstripped all other sectors.

 

It is 8 days until the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission begin to take testimony from top bankers. Their lobbying activities should provide one of the core, and still current, seams of questioning.

News by Impact