Most Read on APEsphere
Most Commented on APEsphere
Blogs we like
Resources
The Government of India has joined a selection of other countries who think that the best way of achieving CSR is to tax companies extra.
The government has agreed that the Companies Act 2009 should require companies to set aside 2% of average net profits to donate to activities of a charitable nature.
For some companies this will be cheap. Take the example of Dow Chemicals' subsidiary Union Carbide - the one they bought after it had killed something in the region of 20,000 inhabitants of Bhopal via a chemical leak. Two percent of net profits of a subsidiary which at the time was dormant would be next to nothing. So Corporate Social Responsibility for that company in that case under the proposed amendment would equate to a big fat nothing.
The legislation is hinged on a wilful misunderstanding of the true nature of CSR. Corporate responsibility is not about giving something back; it is about not inflating profits in the first place by undertaking activities that place the public or the environment in harm's way, or that otherwise create public costs.
A report on last week's Business in the Community Conference suggests it is getting easier to see who is committed to responsible business.
If a company's responsible business focus is on "giving back" then it appears those initiatives have been the first to suffer as cash flows tighten. Those were hardly indicative of a truly responsible approach to business in the first place.
More disturbing are tales of banks completely stripping out their CSR teams. Either those teams had the wrong kind of skills needed for rebuilding trust in the sector (i.e. they were focused on the goodwash version of CSR rather than on instilling an ethical culture and appropriate corporate governance mechanisms) or financial firms have not realised the extent of the problems their sector faces.
In a comment article yesterday in Director Magazine, Jack Welch tried to help by clarifying where CSR should be prioritized during a downturn.
It makes depressing reading because here we have a business leader emeritus completely failing to understand what corporate social responsibility is.
CSR, according to Mr Welch, essentially comes down to "giving back" (what we used to simply call philanthropy) and to products that meet the demand for sustainable alternatives.
Such CSR, he continues, has to be toned down when the going gets tough.
My problem with his argument is twofold:
1/ CSR is first and foremost a management framework for enabling ethical decision making to take place within a short-term profit obsessed corporate culture. Mr Welch does not mention ethics once, nor does he indicate explicitly whether our ethics should take a back seat in tough times.
2/ Mr Welch's argument betrays the fundamental problem with the way that the bulk of the CSR industry chooses to present the case for doing the right thing (i.e. behaving ethically): that good companies reap financial rewards. The flaw in relying on the profit motive as the driver for ensuring that your product range and manufacturing processes limit negative social and environmental impacts is clearly laid out by Mr Welch:
"When gas costs $4 per gallon, a hybrid Toyota Prius is an attractive value proposition. When gas is $2 per gallon, that's no longer the case. When most consumers have good jobs and feel secure in them, it makes sense to expect them to pay more for a product that's environmentally friendly. When bank accounts have been drained, that more expensive product is a very tough sell."
If corporate social responsibility has been robbed of any useful meaning, perhaps we should start encouraging business leaders like Mr Welch to give an opinion on their prioritization in times of crisis of, say, "ethics management" - a broad enough term to encompass the firm's approach to managing social and environmental impacts.
Mixing up CSR with good old philanthropy, public relations or product innovation and ignoring the ethical conduct of business is just shell gaming.
Communications professionals in Ghana have called on the government to implement a National Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Framework.
The call was made at a trade fair organized by the Junior Chamber International (JCI) Ghana and supported by other local business groups.
According to the report in the Ghanaian Chronicle, the group called "for a regulatory body to be set up to regulate corporate social responsibility to meet international standards, adding Listed Companies on the Ghana Stock Exchange should be required to report on their CSR."
Mr. Kweku Rockson, a senior lecturer at the Ghana Institute of Journalism, "urged the government to create a public policy framework, including legislation for the corporate social responsibility to check the operations of companies in the country."
The International Federation of Accounting (IFAC) - the global professional association for accountants - has produced a sustainability framework.
According to Greenbiz, the framework "is a web-based tool that targets professional accountants working in all kinds of different organizations who the IFAC believes can "influence the way organizations integrate sustainability into their objectives, strategies, management and definitions of success."
...
IFAC borrows heavily from the decade-old SIGMA Project. This project developed guidelines to help provide clear, practical advice to organizations to help them make move down the path towards sustainability. It was the first effort to link management systems, risk management, business excellence frameworks, the three responsibilities, and continual improvement into a single framework."
GreenBiz observes that the tool helps accountants by cutting through the internet "noise" on sustainability and giving them a coherent framework for action, one which, they note, CSR and sustainability officers often lack.
It should always have been such, but the last time payment of corporation tax was viewed as an issue of social responsibility rather than as something to be minimised as a simple matter of financial efficiency was during the Second World War.
Stock indices comprising companies assessed against standards of corporate responsibility - "socially responsible investment" (SRI) indices - are well established elsewhere, including the FTSE4Good indices in the United Kingdom and the Dow Jones Sustainability Indices in the United States.
A Thai SEC committee has been working since late 2006 on the question of how to promote greater corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Thai listed companies.
SRI indices can help to push corporate responsiblity standards incrementally higher by setting a bar just slightly higher than average standards being achieved currently, then reviewing and raising that bar over time.
The APEsphere troop
Has "CSR" become a code word for "profit trumps ethics"
The term "CSR" appears to have become a way of avoiding uncomfortable conversations within business about the ethics of business impacts. >>
- 3
- on 30 May 2009
Never kick a straw man when he’s down (TML No.4 part 3)
This is part 3 of The Missing Link number 4, in which CSR is defined. >>
- 5
- on 15 May 2009
Never kick a straw man when he’s down (TML No.4 part 2)
What of the next line of attack: that activities that benefit society at the expense of shareholders amount to “borrowed virtue” >>
- 0
- on 15 May 2009
Never kick a straw man when he’s down (TML No.4 part 1)
If corporate social responsibility did not exist, would we need to invent it? >>
- 1
- on 15 May 2009
Must read analysis
News by Impact
- India jumps on CSR legislation bandwagon
- Global Survey of Environmental, Social and Governance P
- Recession sorts out commitment from goodwash
- Dog bites man: Jack Welch trips up over CSR
- Ghana: Comms professionals call for CSR framework
- Why Indians are not philanthropists
- India jumps on CSR legislation bandwagon
- Global Survey of Environmental, Social and Governance P
- Bangladeshi regulator to monitor bank CSR
- Canada: CSR counsellor met with anger, allegations
- Socially responsible downsizing
- Recession sorts out commitment from goodwash
- Thai SEC to promote criteria for inclusion in SRI index
Christine Arena 
