Sign in  |  Register  |  Help

Most Read on APEsphere

Most Commented on APEsphere

Blogs we like

Resources

 
By Andrew Newton on 01 Sep, 2009 - 04:23 UTC

I received an email from Bentley University in the US this weekend encouraging recipients to get their colleges to embrace a pledge upon graduation.

 

The pledge goes:

 

"I pledge to explore and take into account the social and environmental consequences of any job I consider and will try to improve these aspects of any organizations for which I work."

 

What I like about the pledge is:

  • simplicity
  • encourages the graduate to explore, i.e. to ask questions. I believe that most ethical (social and environmental) issues at firms begin with people who fail to ask questions
  • it encourages the pledgee to recognize their freedom of action, their individual moral agency

What I like less about the pledge is:

  • it does not mention ethics or, even more boldly and generally, something like "the firm's negative impacts on other people". Graduates will be faced with many more ethical challenges than solely social or environmental ones
  • it does not make explicit that an ethical outcome might result in not taking on a suspect piece of business i.e. that an ethical solution might not be the most profitable, at least in the short term. The email I received makes it clear that some have taken it this way, but something about "not compromising an ethical outcome for profi maximization" would make explicit that the pledge is worthless if maximum profit must be achieved even at the cost of broader ethical concerns.

My only other concern is the "is that all?" point: I know that institutions that encourage adoption of the pledge will often require students to undertake a business ethics course - at least I hope they do. They may even offer a course on corporate social responsibility.

 

But the pledge seems to me first and foremost to be about being aware of one's agency - of one's choice of action - of having consciousness of that, and that is a tall order for a single sentence.

 

To my mind, that degree of consciousness emerges from the development of the habit of questioning, and in particular the habit of questioning the "taken-for-granteds" of business.

 

Not everyone feels comfortable questioning the basic tenets of contemporary business ideology; fewer still are able, even though we insist that contemporary capitalism is about freedom. Freedom begins with free thinking.

 

Even those who are willing to question need an opportunity to develop the skills for doing so constructively and relevantly. Where else will that occur but in a business school degree?

 

It is high time we built on the pledge movement by demanding that not just business ethics and CSR, but rather the philosophy of business be integrated as a core foundation stone of every business school program.

 

Get more information about the pledge from the Graduation Pledge Alliance homepage.

ADVERTISEMENT
Reading: M.B.A.s Seek Social Change
By Andrew Newton on 15 Oct, 2009 - 04:24 UTC
ADVERTISEMENT

The APEsphere troop

Has "CSR" become a code word for "profit trumps ethics"

Posted by apesphere to the APEsphere blog

The term "CSR" appears to have become a way of avoiding uncomfortable conversations within business about the ethics of business impacts. >>

  • 3
  • on 30 May 2009

Never kick a straw man when he’s down (TML No.4 part 3)

Posted by apesphere to the The Missing Link blog

This is part 3 of The Missing Link number 4, in which CSR is defined. >>

  • 5
  • on 15 May 2009

Never kick a straw man when he’s down (TML No.4 part 2)

Posted by apesphere to the The Missing Link blog

What of the next line of attack: that activities that benefit society at the expense of shareholders amount to “borrowed virtue” >>

  • 0
  • on 15 May 2009

Never kick a straw man when he’s down (TML No.4 part 1)

Posted by apesphere to the The Missing Link blog

If corporate social responsibility did not exist, would we need to invent it? >>

  • 1
  • on 15 May 2009

CSR: Confusions of Social Responsibility (TML no.3)

Posted by apesphere to the The Missing Link blog

There are so many competing definitions of corporate social responsibility (CSR). We need to define what we are talking about in The Missing Link. >>

  • 0
  • on 28 Apr 2009

Banking Industry Lessons Learned

Posted by christinearena to the Case in Point blog

Have big banks learned a single lesson from Enron's past mistakes? Apparently not. But smaller community banks have, and are now reaping the rewards. >>

  • 0
  • on 27 Apr 2009

Where's the Love?

Posted by christinearena to the Case in Point blog

Why do some companies win public trust and others lose it? Research indicates that it has more to do with purpose than public relations. >>

  • 0
  • on 22 Apr 2009

We care about the footprint, let’s not forget the foot

Saving the environment is in style, but concern for the workers who make our shoes isn’t. >>

  • 3
  • on 22 Apr 2009

Universities leading fight against Russell

27 schools cancel contract with company for busting unions >>

  • 1
  • on 13 Apr 2009

What they don’t teach you at business school about CSR

Posted by apesphere to the The Missing Link blog

A missing link, according to Wikipedia, is an "intermediary form of life that illustrates an evolutionary transition". >>

  • 0
  • on 13 Apr 2009

News by Impact