ADVERTISEMENT
Most Read on APEsphere
Most Commented on APEsphere
Blogs we like
Resources
Biotech firms stymie independent research into GMOs
Report Abuse:
So that we can keep the site friendly, legal and on-topic, please click the Report Abuse button if this story breaks the APEsphere Code.
Added by
apesphere on 23 Feb 2009
From: www.nytimes.com
|
| Image courtesy Lorri37 via Flickr |
Scientists are complaining that research into environmental impacts of genetically modified organisms (GMO) is being blocked by biotech firms.
According to a report in the New York Times, the university scientists submitted their statement of complaint to the US Environmental Protection Agency as part of that agency's consultation on forthcoming scientific meetings for biotech crops.
The essence of the scientists' allegations is that buyers of GMO seed have to enter into an agreement with the firm that, among other things, prohibits growing the crop for research purposes without the company's permission. Permission is often denied, the scientists claim, or else permission is granted subject to conditions such as a requirement that no results are published unless the company has reviewed them.
The result is that independent research into the environmental impact of GMO crops is severely constrained or else impossible.
Given that the results of genetic modification on the environment may be unpredictable, crops are being distributed with uncertain and perhaps harmful consequences.
According to a report in the New York Times, the university scientists submitted their statement of complaint to the US Environmental Protection Agency as part of that agency's consultation on forthcoming scientific meetings for biotech crops.
The essence of the scientists' allegations is that buyers of GMO seed have to enter into an agreement with the firm that, among other things, prohibits growing the crop for research purposes without the company's permission. Permission is often denied, the scientists claim, or else permission is granted subject to conditions such as a requirement that no results are published unless the company has reviewed them.
The result is that independent research into the environmental impact of GMO crops is severely constrained or else impossible.
Given that the results of genetic modification on the environment may be unpredictable, crops are being distributed with uncertain and perhaps harmful consequences.
Andrew Newton is the author of The Handbook of Compliance: Making Ethics Work in Financial Services
Julie Nelson 

Comments
Add a comment