Sign in  |  Register  |  Help

Most Read on APEsphere

Most Commented on APEsphere

Blogs we like

Resources



Judge Jed not impressed by BoA deal with SEC

Add this link to:

Related Links

Report Abuse:

So that we can keep the site friendly, legal and on-topic, please click the Report Abuse button if this story breaks the APEsphere Code.

Posted by apesphere on 25 Aug 2009

Image courtesy teofilo via Flickr

While bankers and politicians seem anxious to get back to business as usual, the current difficulty being faced by Bank of America suggests that “normality” is not going to return any time soon, if indeed it is permitted to do so at all.


The Securities and Exchange Commission is trying to conclude an investigation into Bank of America’s payment of $3.6 billion in bonuses to executives of the sinking ship that was Merrill Lynch upon the former’s purchase of the latter. The SEC and Bank of America have agreed a $33 million settlement – an amount that some might call (and have called) derisory.


The SEC replies that it is unfair to penalize shareholders overmuch for the actions of executives. But hang on, I thought shareholders were supposed to be owners holding risk equity? That is what is supposed to provide shareholders with the incentive to keep an eye on how executives run their business, rather than simply smile while the money comes in. If shareholders don’t end up picking up the tab for reckless risk-taking then you create a moral hazard; shareholders will be better off turning a blind eye than supervising.


Enter Judge Jed S. Rakoff, a United States District Court judge in Manhattan. Whereas most such settlements are simply waved through, he has the temerity to question whether this settlement is really in anyone’s interest. Apparently he would like to take this opportunity to exert what little influence he has to deter further behaviour of this kind.


No doubt he has his own reasons for thinking the time has come to take a stand. Judge Rakoff presided over the SEC’s case against WorldCom – as in “corporate fraud on the scale of Enron and WorldCom” – and took the step of appointing a former SEC commissioner as a Corporate Monitor to oversee the reform of WorldCom’s corporate governance. He will recall that there was much talk after Enron and WorldCom of the importance of not letting big business return to its former ways, particularly the financial and professional advisers who enabled those corporations.


They did, however, and on his watch. And he knows that his courtroom is practically the only venue where pure greed can be stopped in its tracks.
 

ADVERTISMENT

Comments

Add a comment

Already an APEsphere user? Login for one-click commenting. If not, sign in by email.