ADVERTISEMENT
Most Read on APEsphere
Most Commented on APEsphere
Blogs we like
Resources
Executive pay: be sceptical of claims of restraint
Report Abuse:
So that we can keep the site friendly, legal and on-topic, please click the Report Abuse button if this story breaks the APEsphere Code.
Added by
apesphere on 24 Jun 2009
From: business.smh.com.au
|
| Image courtesy BullionVault via Flickr |
Australian investor activists are urging investors to look beyond the headline cash figure when deciding whether a firm is tying pay to performance.
Many companies have said they are freezing or cutting executive compensation in response to the downturn. The devil amy remain in variable pay elements such as short term bonuses and share options.
The real levels of compensation may not be known until next year's report and accounts. The focus now should be on ensuring a tight definition of performance to which executives can be held.
Andrew Newton is the author of The Handbook of Compliance: Making Ethics Work in Financial Services
- Read the source
- Topics: Governance & Engagement, anz group, asia pacific, australia, boardroom pay, commonwealth bank, corporate governance, executive compensation, executive pay, financial services, investor activism, investors, john shields (university of sydney business school), pay for performance, quantas, remuneration committee, remuneration policies, telecommunications, telstra
Andrew Newton 

Comments
Add a comment